Search for: All records

Abstract One way to bring greater awareness to the fact that language can be, and often is, studied scientifically is to show people the scientific tools that linguists use to study it, such as the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). This project investigated how doing a common IPA activity might influence people’s perceptions of language science and linguists. Adult visitors to a science museum (N = 117) participated in an activity in which they saw their name transcribed into the IPA and were guided to notice how it differed from the standard spelling, informed about some basic articulatory phonetics connected to the sounds in their names, and encouraged to think about the differences between sounds and letters more generally. Participants were then surveyed about what they had learned and their attitudes about language science. The results showed that most participants learned at least some of the core content material. More notably, the participants were more likely to believe that aspects of language such as poetry and dialects could be studied experimentally by scientists than a control group of adults who had not participated. These results demonstrate that even a brief intervention, if thoughtfully conducted, can shift attitudes towards the belief that language can be studied scientifically. 

This paper reports on the creation and composition of a new corpus of children’s speech, the Ohio Child Speech Corpus, which is publicly available on the Talkbank-CHILDES website. The audio corpus contains speech samples from 303 children ranging in age from 4 – 9 years old, all of whom participated in a seven-task elicitation protocol conducted in a science museum lab. In addition, an interactive social robot controlled by the researchers joined the sessions for approximately 60% of the children, and the corpus itself was collected in the peri‑pandemic period. Two analyses are reported that highlighted these last two features. One set of analyses found that the children spoke significantly more in the presence of the robot relative to its absence, but no effects of speech complexity (as measured by MLU) were found for the robot’s presence. Another set of analyses compared children tested immediately post-pandemic to children tested a year later on two school-readiness tasks, an Alphabet task and a Reading Passages task. This analysis showed no negative impact on these tasks for our highly-educated sample of children just coming off of the pandemic relative to those tested later. These analyses demonstrate just two possible types of questions that this corpus could be used to investigate. 

Engaging with the public is increasingly seen as an important role of scientists. Despite that, few opportunities exist for undergraduate students to receive training in engaging with the public about science. Thus, little is known about the impact of such training on students. The goal of the current study was to investigate the impact of public engagement training on participants in a summer program for undergraduates that provides training in both research and engagement activities. The results of our interviews suggest that providing opportunities for undergraduates to engage with the public (1) has many personal, academic, and career benefits for students; (2) increases participants’ interest in public engagement; and (3) may contribute to helping students develop and maintain an identity as scientists. Importantly, students from minoritized racial groups may be even more impacted by this experience. These data suggest that early experiences with public engagement may not only be an important way to increase the number of publicly engaged scientists but may also broaden participation in science. 

This corpus was collected in the Language Sciences Research Lab, a working lab embedded inside of a science museum: the Center of Science and Industry in Columbus, Ohio, USA. Participants were recruited from the floor of the museum and run in a semi-public space. Three distinctive features of the corpus are: (1) an interactive social robot (specifically, a Jibo robot) was present and participated in the sessions for roughly half the children; (2) all children were recorded with a lapel mic generating high quality audio (available through CHILDES), as well as a distal table mic generating low quality audio (available on request) to facilitate strong tests of automated speech processing on the data; and (3) the data were collected in the peri-pandemic period, beginning in the summer of 2021 just after COVID-19 restrictions were being eased and ending in the summer of 2022 – thus providing a snapshot of language development in a distinctive time of the world. A YouTube video on the Jibo robot is available here . 

Abstract This paper reports on an investigation of adults' level of endorsement of 18 language myths, including myths about non‐mainstream dialects of English, children's language development, bilingualism, linguistic diversity across the world, the use of English in the language arts, and the job of a linguist. Participants (N = 187) read short vignettes of situations related to each misconception and were asked to justify their assessment of the situation. Responses were coded according to whether they endorsed the myth within the situation. Results showed that endorsement of language myths was highly dependent on the specific myth. Some myths were strongly endorsed (e.g. myths related to linguistic prejudice and children's language development), others were strongly rejected (e.g. myths related to the harmful nature of bilingualism), and others received a mixed pattern of endorsement and rejection. We discuss how this snapshot of public understanding can help linguists target their efforts at public education.